Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ekodum - Re: [Ekodum] životní cyklus rekuperační jednotky

ekodum AT fsv.cvut.cz

Předmět: Ekologické stavebnictví

List archive

Re: [Ekodum] životní cyklus rekuperační jednotky


Chronological Podle vláken 
  • From: Max Vittrup Jensen <max AT permalot.org>
  • To: Ekologické stavebnictví <ekodum AT fsv.cvut.cz>
  • Subject: Re: [Ekodum] životní cyklus rekuperační jednotky
  • Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 22:25:48 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://mailman.fsv.cvut.cz/pipermail/ekodum>
  • List-id: Ekologické stavebnictví <ekodum.fsv.cvut.cz>

Here is a more philosophical answer, taken from an article at the Natural Building Network (nbnetwork.org):

"...Our homes are our greatest investment not just financially but in our health, the health of the environment and in our children’s future. Becoming informed home buyers and occupants is the surest way to find and maintain a good home. The act of dwelling and all its associated systems was once innate cultural knowledge passed on from generation to generation in homes that were also passed on from generation to generation. Now understanding home is considered to be specialized knowledge. In fact most home energy rating systems assume occupant ignorance.
For example mechanized occupant sensors to turn lights on and off and operate mechanical ventilation systems are rewarded on green score cards. But mechanical systems inevitably break long before the life of a home is played out. Wouldn’t it be smarter to reward built-in opportunities for occupants to operate their homes wisely over the expected life of the building?
In our high desert climate, with large daily temperature swings, a combination of shading, cross ventilation and interior mass walls works well to cool a home without the need for mechanical intervention if occupants open their windows at night. These same mass walls, if heated by a radiant heat source, help to keep a home comfortably warm in the winter.

We know that less need for mechanical intervention means less energy use but it can also mean a healthier living environment. The ideal indoor climate would emulate the feel of the outdoor climate on a fine day. Heating air and blowing it around through duct work changes the nature of that air. The indoor air is depleted of health enhancing negative ions because they cling to metal and synthetic ductwork. Circulating heat via forced air tends to create stratified temperature differentials and makes us uncomfortable. Forced air systems are noisy. Baseboard heaters trap and fry dust and create pollution. Electric baseboard heaters emit high magnetic fields. Radiant floor heating, perhaps one of the more comfortable options, has long response times and creates temperature monotony. Does it not make ultimate sense to first design a home with the least need for mechanical intervention and then choose our intervention wisely?"
Paula Baker-Laporte FAIA is an architect and a certified building biology practitioner.



danielgrmela AT email.cz wrote:
Dobrý den,

existuje prosím nějaká studie posouzení celého životního cyklu rekuperační
jednotky pro pasivní dům ?

Zajímalo by mě, zda je vůbec ta energie, kterou rekuperace ušetří na vytápění
větší, než energie spotřebovaná na těžbu surovin, výrobu, dopravu a recyklaci
celého zařízení včetně odpadních meziproduktů vzniklých při výrobě.

Zda je ekologicky výhodnější nízkoenergetický dům bez rekuprace či pasivní
dům s rekuperací. Všechno ostatní by v tom domě klidně mohlo být úplně
stejné, nebo ne ?


Dan Grmela


_______________________________________________
Ekodum mailing list
Ekodum AT fsv.cvut.cz
http://mailman.fsv.cvut.cz/mailman/listinfo/ekodum





Archivace běží na MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page